Skip to main content

Table 1 Quantitative comparison of three metrics between magnetic particle imaging (MPI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in specific application scenarios

From: Exploring the diagnostic potential: magnetic particle imaging for brain diseases

Scenarios

Methods

Gradient (T/m)

Sensitivity

Temporal resolution

Spatial resolution

Findings

References

Detection of MSCs

MPI

3

4000 cells (76 ng Fe)

–

2 mm

The high sensitivity of MPI facilitates tracking cells and detecting tumor metastasis

[30]

MRI

3

256,000 cells (9.01 × 1016 19F)

–

1 mm

CAR T-cell tracking

MPI

6

2000 cells

–

1 mm

MPI provides a new way for immunization therapy with high sensitivity

[20]

MRI

7

20,000 cells

–

200 μm

Ischemic stroke

MPI

2.5

–

21.5 ms

3 mm

MPI with high temporal resolution is helpful to monitor acute vascular diseases

[60]

MRI

7

–

177 ms

130 μm

Brain perfusion

MPI

2.5

About 69 MSCs (896 pg Fe)

21.5 ms

500 μm

MPI can detect a few tracers with high temporal resolution and has potential for early detection of cerebrovascular diseases

[68]

MRI

7

–

177 ms

130 μm

Measurement of CBV

fMPI

2.83

CNR = 12–29

–

3 mm

fMPI with a low gradient provides much higher CNR than fMRI, promoting its potential to detect weak signals of diseases

[62]

fMRI

9.4

CNR = 5.95

–

375 μm (smooth to 3 mm for comparing)

  1. fMPI functional magnetic particle imaging, fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging, CNR contrast-to-noise ratio, MSCs mesenchymal stem cells, CAR chimeric antigen receptor, CBV cerebral blood volume